S3 Chrome S20 Series

S3 Graphics' multi-GPU technology Multichrome explored

PCGH.de takes a look at the Mulitchrome technology from S3's Chrome GPU. (Raffael Vötter, 05.02.2008)
 
Chrome S27 Multichrome in 3DMark03 (Bild: PCGH)
 
Chrome S27 Multichrome in 3DMark03 (Bild: PCGH) [Quelle: siehe Bildergalerie]
Multichrome is S3's answer to SLI and Crossfire. At best, it is comparable with Atis "software" Crossfire, because two Chrome S2x cards communicate exclusively via the PCI Express interface with each other; there are no bridges. Similar to the multi-GPU solutions of the two big ones (AMD, Nvidia), S3 is also using AFR (Alternate frame rendering) and the slower technology SFR (Split Frame Rendering) to balance the work. The GPUs alternately calculate different frames, and therefore achieve at least theoretically a performance doubling. We have to mention that Multichrome is also struggling with the now infamous "micro stuttering", but this issue, we will devote separately.


Testbed
We test in the following two Chrome S27 cards, each with 128 MiByte VRAM under Windows XP SP2. A Gigabyte DS3P-965P is the basis, which has a PCI-E x16 and a x4 slot. The latter has probably a slowdown effect on the communication between the two cards, which exclusively relies on the PCI-Express. We will do further tests on an X38 board, and in the case of gross deviations publish the results.

The handling of multichrome is simple enough: install cards, install drivers, activate multichrome within the driver panel - that's it. The latter is reliably and without rebooting, which is a very positive experience with SLI and Crossfire and their problems in mind.

With multichrome there is a simple exe-recognition. So many games are not recognized by the driver automatically and only use a single GPU. Here it helps to rename the execution file in 3DMark03.exe, 3DMark05.exe or Oblivion.exe, whereupon multichrome activated. This trick helped us with World of Warcraft, Crysis, Stalker and Flatout 2.

Performance and scaling
As the two big ones invest a lot of financial and programming power into SLI/Crossfire, you cannot expect too much from S3. Like SLI and Crossfire, multichrome shows a mixed picture. Depending on the application, a duo of two S27 cards scale up to 100, but often only 30 percent. And sometimes AFR / SFR even acts counterproductive - like in 3D Mark 06 (see benchmarks). The best "optimized" was apparently 3D Mark 03, because here two S27 are almost twice as fast as a single one.




This beautiful prelude is not followed by the gaming benchmarks. Fear gains an average of 38 percent by Multichrome, but the minimum Fps fall down reproducible. The Source Engine works out better: Half-Life 2 is about 30 percent faster in 1024x768 (with 5x/9x SSAA and 16:1 AF even 90 percent!) and Lost Coast as well as World of Warcraft gained by almost 50 percent.

Summary
If Crossfire and SLI are too immature for you, you should stay away from two Chrome cards. Most games need to be renamed and scale not too good. Moreover, the stuttering effect is always present.

If you still like to do something special, we recommend Ebay. S27 cards are no longer in retail, but the smaller Chrome S25 with insane 512 MiByte VRAM are to be but found at the online auction house. The difference to the tested S27s are primarily the reduced clock rates: 500/400 MHz instead of 700/660 MHz. At 30 euros x 2, you may enter the world of Multichrome.




Bildergalerie zum Artikel
 
 
Alle Artikel zu Grafikkarten von Nvidia und AMD/Ati finden Sie auf der Grafik-Themenseite. Eine aktuelle Grafikkarten-Kaufberatung finden Sie im Artikel Ati- und Nvidia-Grafikkarten: Test-Übersicht und aktuelle Kauf-Tipps. Mehr zum Geforce-Entwickler Nvidia und Radeon-Entwickler AMD erfahren Sie in unseren Themen-Specials.
 
 
 
 
 
  1. Powercolor Radeon HD 7950 PCS+
    € 418.70
  2. Sapphire Radeon HD 7950
    € 394.80
  3. XFX Radeon HD 7970 925M Core Edit...
    € 465.80
  4. Sapphire Radeon HD 6870
    € 142.90
  5. Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 OC
    € 420.39
  6. Sapphire Radeon HD 6850
    € 113.70
  7. Gigabyte GeForce GTX 560 Ti OC
    € 189.90
  8. ASUS HD7970-DC2T-3GD5
    € 529.87
  9. MSI R7950-2PMD3GD5/OC
    € 412.90
  10. Powercolor Radeon HD 7950
    € 399.29
 
 
707 User online
Anmelden & mitmachen
Benutzername:
Kennwort:
Angemeldet bleiben
Alles zu Diablo 3
Alles zu SKYRIM
Alle News, alle Infos
Komplett-PCs von PCGH
Komplett-PCs von PCGH
So unterstützen Sie PCGH
Folgen Sie PCGH
Aktuelle Heft-Ausgabe
Welche Grafikkarte nutzt du derzeit zum Spielen? (Februar 2012)
Radeon HD 7970 (2.23%)
Radeon HD 7950 (NEU!) (0.56%)
Radeon HD 6990 (0.28%)
Radeon HD 6970 (4.74%)
Radeon HD 6950 (7.38%)
Radeon HD 6870 (5.01%)
Radeon HD 6850 (1.95%)
Radeon HD 5970 (0.28%)
Radeon HD 5870 (5.57%)
Radeon HD 5850 (5.99%)
Radeon HD 5770/5750/6790/6770/6750 (3.62%)
Radeon HD 4890/4870 (3.20%)
Radeon HD 4870/4850 X2 (0.14%)
Radeon HD 4850/4830 (0.84%)
Radeon HD 3870/3850 (0.14%)
Andere HD 2000/3000/4000/5000/6000 (0.97%)
Radeon-X-1000-Reihe (0.14%)
Geforce GTX 590 (0.28%)
Geforce GTX 580 (9.19%)
Geforce GTX 570/GTX 560 Ti-448 (12.81%)
Geforce GTX 560 Ti (7.52%)
Geforce GTX 550 Ti (0.42%)
Geforce GTX 480 (2.65%)
Geforce GTX 470 (5.85%)
Geforce GTX 460/560 Non-Ti/465 (7.94%)
Geforce GTS 450 (0.42%)
Geforce GTX 285/280/275 (3.20%)
Geforce GTX 260 (alle Versionen) (2.37%)
Geforce GTS 250/9800/8800 GT/GTS/GTX(+)/Ultra (1.53%)
Andere Geforce 500/400/200/8000/9000 (1.25%)
Geforce-7-Reihe (0.28%)
Ganz andere Grafikkarte (S3, Matrox, 3dfx & Co.) (0.00%)
Ich nutze eine Intel-IGP (z. B. HD 3000) (0.14%)
Ich nutze eine AMD-APU/IGP (0.42%)
Ich fühle mich geistig überfordert (0.70%)
718 Teilnehmer
PCGH-Webshops